Among 74 surveyed electrophysiology professionals, 81% perceived EP simulators as useful, yet only 18% reported having an EP simulator at their institution.
Cross-Sectional (n=74)
Yes
74 electrophysiology professionals from 22 countries completed an online survey regarding the use and perceived need for EP simulators.
20-item online questionnaire on the use and perceived need for EP simulators
Current use of EP simulators and perceived need for these tools in clinical training and practice
There is a strong perceived need for EP simulators among electrophysiology professionals to improve training and safety, but current institutional access is severely lacking.
AIMS: Simulator training has been recently introduced in electrophysiology (EP) programmes in order to improve catheter manipulation skills without complication risks. The aim of this study is to survey the current use of EP simulators and the perceived need for these tools in clinical training and practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 20-item online questionnaire developed by the Scientific Initiatives Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) in collaboration with EHRA Digital Committee was disseminated through the EHRA Scientific Research Network members, national EP groups, and social media platforms. Seventy-four respondents from 22 countries (73% males; 50% under 40 years old) completed the survey. Despite being perceived as useful among EP professionals (81%), EP simulators are rarely a part of the institutional cardiology training programme (20%) and only 18% of the respondents have an EP simulator at their institution. When available, simulators are mainly used in EP to train transseptal puncture, ablation, and mapping, followed by device implantation (cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT, leadless, and conduction system pacing CSP). Almost all respondents (96%) believe that simulator programmes should be a part of the routine institutional EP training, hopefully developed by EHRA, in order to improve the efficacy and safety of EP procedures and in particular CSP 58%, CRT 42%, leadless pacing 38%, or complex arrhythmia ablations (VT 58%, PVI 45%, and PVC 42%). CONCLUSION: This current EHRA survey identified a perceived need but a lack of institutional simulator programme access for electrophysiologists who could benefit from it in order to speed up the learning curve process and reduce complications of complex EP procedures.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fleur V.Y. Tjong
Edith Cowan University
Laura Perrotta
Electrophysiology
Andreas Goette
University of Insubria
EP Europace
Karolinska Institutet
University of Amsterdam
Maastricht University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tjong et al. (Wed,) conducted a cross-sectional in Electrophysiology professionals (n=74). EP simulators was evaluated on Current use and perceived need for EP simulators. Among 74 surveyed electrophysiology professionals, 81% perceived EP simulators as useful, yet only 18% reported having an EP simulator at their institution.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ecf7e6e6b94f521a45e12 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae037