Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background aimsThe goal of this study was to analyze online marketing representations made by 300 US businesses selling allogeneic perinatal stem cell products. The study was conducted after a period of enforcement discretion by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).MethodsData mining and content analysis were used to identify, analyze and categorize marketing claims made on the websites of 300 businesses selling perinatal stem cell interventions.ResultsThe study identified types of perinatal interventions companies advertised, geographic locations of clinics selling such products, types of companies operating in this space, diseases and injuries such businesses claim to treat, prices companies charge for such interventions, brand names of advertised perinatal cell products and identities of suppliers.ConclusionsA substantial number of US businesses market unapproved perinatal stem cell products for various indications. This widespread commercial activity occurred following the conclusion of a period of enforcement discretion by the FDA and suggests the need for more robust and comprehensive regulatory responses to businesses selling unapproved perinatal stem cell products.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Leigh Turner
J. Wang
Juan Ramon Martinez
Cytotherapy
University of California, Irvine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Turner et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7b7e2b6db64358770ebe9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.01.001
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: