Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
17–4 precipitate hardening (PH) stainless steel is used in various applications including in the aerospace, marine, and chemical industries, largely due to its unique combination of corrosion resistance and high strength, which is achieved by the formation of nanoscale Cu-rich precipitates during aging. 17–4 PH has been widely researched for its applicability for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). However, there are discrepancies in the literature on its heat treatment response, which seem to be linked to compositional variations. Systematic studies of the interplay between these variations and nanoscale precipitation are currently missing. Using atom probe tomography, we present a systematic study of the heat treatment responses of two variants of LPBF 17–4 PH builds fabricated from different powder feedstocks, with significant differences in N contents (High vs Low N 17–4). Both variants formed predominantly δ-ferritic as-built microstructures. The as-built High N 17–4 variant showed a higher volume fraction of austenite which further increased upon solution annealing and quenching. The consequence was no appreciable hardening effect due to the absence of Cu precipitation in either austenite or martensite after aging, degrading the alloy's desirable property profile. Conversely, Low N 17–4 showed no austenite in the as-built condition and a fully martensitic matrix after solution annealing. This variant had the desired aging response; a ~ 140 HV 5 increase in hardness due to nanoscale Cu precipitation. Our findings describe the deleterious effects of compositional variations incurred during the LPBF process flow and how they can be overcome in 17–4 PH and similar steels.
Moyle et al. (Tue,) studied this question.