Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In biomechanical research, advanced joint simulators such as VIVOTM offer the ability to test artificial joints under realistic kinematics and load conditions. Furthermore, it promises to simplify testing with advanced control approaches and the ability to include virtual ligaments. However, the overall functionality concerning specific test setup conditions, such as the joint lubrication or control algorithm, has not been investigated in-depth so far. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the basic functionality of the VIVOTM joint simulator with six degrees of freedom in order to highlight its capabilities and limitations when testing a total knee endoprostheses using a passive flexion–extension movement. For this, different test setup conditions were investigated, e.g., the control method, repeatability and kinematic reproducibility, waveform frequency, lubrication, and implant embedding. The features offered by the VIVOTM joint simulator are useful for testing joint endoprostheses under realistic loading scenarios. It was found that the results were highly influenced by the varying test setup conditions, although the same mechanical load case was analysed. This study highlights the difficulties encountered when using six degrees of freedom joint simulators, contributes to their understanding, and supports users of advanced joint simulators through functional and tribological analysis of joint endoprostheses.
Henke et al. (Tue,) studied this question.