Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Distal transradial access (dTRA) is an alternative to conventional forearm transradial access (fTRA) for coronary angiography (CAG). Differences in healing of the radial artery (RA) in the forearm have not been evaluated between these 2 access strategies. We sought to compare the mean difference in forearm RA intimal‐medial thickening (IMT) in patients randomized to dTRA versus fTRA. Methods and Results In this single‐center randomized clinical trial, 64 patients undergoing nonemergent CAG were randomized (1:1) to dTRA versus fTRA. Ultra–high‐resolution (55‐MHz) vascular ultrasound of the forearm and distal RA was performed pre‐CAG and at 90 days. The primary end point was the mean change in forearm RA IMT. Secondary end points included procedural characteristics, vascular injury, RA occlusion, and ipsilateral hand pain and function. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, mean forearm RA IMT, and procedural specifics were similar between the dTRA and fTRA cohorts. There was no difference in mean change in forearm RA IMT between the 2 cohorts (0.07 versus 0.07 mm; P =0.37). No RA occlusions or signs of major vascular injury were observed at 90 days. Ipsilateral hand pain and function (Borg pain scale score: 12 versus 11; P =0.24; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulders, and Hand scale score: 6 versus 8; P =0.46) were comparable. Conclusions Following CAG, dTRA was associated with no differences in mean change of forearm RA IMT, hand pain, and function versus fTRA for CAG. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate mechanisms and predictors of RA healing and identify effective strategies to preserving RA integrity for repeated procedures. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04801901.
Tehrani et al. (Wed,) studied this question.