Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Lung cancer is the most common global cancer in terms of incidence and mortality. Its main driver is tobacco smoking. The identification of modifiable risk factors isa public health priority. Green tea consumption has been examined in epidemiological studies, with inconsistent findings. Thus, we aimed to apply Mendelian randomization to clarify any causal link between green tea consumption and the risk of lung cancer. Methods We utilized a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Genetic variants served as instrumental variables. The goal was to explore a causal link between green tea consumption and different lung cancer types. Green tea consumption data was sourced from the UK Biobank dataset, and the genetic association data for various types of lung cancer were sourced from multiple databases. Our analysis included primary inverse-variance weighted (IVW) analyses and various sensitivity test. Results No significant associations were found between green tea intake and any lung cancer subtypes, including non-small cell lung cancer (adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and small cell lung cancer. These findings were consistent when applying multiple Mendelian randomization methods. Conclusion Green tea does not appear to offer protective benefits against lung cancer at a population level. However, lung cancer's complex etiology and green tea's potential health benefitssuggest more research is needed. Further studies should include diverse populations, improved exposure measurements and randomized controlled trials, are warranted.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jieming Lu
Fujian Medical University
Ye Lin
Qingdao University
Junfei Jiang
Fujian Medical University
Frontiers in Nutrition
Fujian Medical University
Union Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e78950b6db6435876fb6f3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1265878