Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction: Self-efficacy is considered one of the key components of breastfeeding success and thus is important to explore. However, this requires reliable measuring tools. Goal: The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the BSES-SF as a measure of confidence in breastfeeding among Slovak mothers, and to determine the self-efficacy of mothers in breastfeeding and its related factors. Methods: The research was designed as a quantitative cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 678 women who were on the 3rd-4th day after delivery. A Slovak version of the 14-item Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form (BSES-SF) was used to assess breastfeeding self-efficacy. Results: Cronbach's alpha of the Slovak version of the BSES-SF was 0.812. CFA has shown that the four-factor model of the BSES-SF offered the best fit for Slovak data. Education (p < 0.001), previous breastfeeding experience (p = 0.015), and skin-to-skin contact (p < 0.001) were shown to be statistically significant factors related to breastfeeding self-efficacy of mothers. Conclusion: The Slovak version of the BSES-SF has shown good psychometric properties and it can be recommended to assess the breastfeeding self-efficacy of mothers in Slovakia. The proven factors related to self-efficacy show the need for individual help, especially for women with higher education, women with a previous negative experience with breastfeeding, and the importance of skin-to-skin contact support.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lucia Mazúchová
Trencianska Univerzita Alexandra Dubceka V Trencine
Erika Maskálová
Národný ústav detských chorôb
Zuzana Škodová
University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik
Kontakt
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mazúchová et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a5b3f8198c9a8aa458c62 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2024.008
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: