Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
To what extent are “generative AI” (as a machine-based form of decision-making) and “generative dialogue” (as a human-based form of decision-making) complimentary or competing? What takes precedence in generative change processes? More fundamentally, should generative artificial intelligence (AI) processes assist human decision-making or should human processes assist generative AI decision-making? The possible implications of these questions are explored. Moreover, it is posited that as generative AI evolves and gains more traction in organizational change initiatives, it is important that it is deployed in ways that support generative conversations rather than ways that undermine or replace them.
Cliff Oswick (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: