Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Scholarly communities have engaged in a variety of topics in response to the advent of systems built on Open Artificial Intelligence (OpenAI's) ChatGPT. Since these Artificial Intelligence (AIs) respond to given prompts by producing grammatically sound and generally pertinent (though occasionally flat-out incorrect, irrelevant, or biased) outputs, utilizing them for a variety of writing jobs, including composing peer review reports, could increase productivity. It is difficult to use ChatGPT effectively, even if it offers a whole new writing and reviewing experience. The authors would like to throw an insight into the benefits of ChatGPT and its role in automated reviewer selection.
Mehta et al. (Fri,) studied this question.