Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The 15N gas flux (15NGF) method allows for direct in situ quantification of dinitrogen (N2) emissions from soils, but a successful cross-comparison with another method is missing. The objectives of this study were to quantify N2 emissions of a wheat rotation using the 15NGF method, to compare these N2 emissions with those obtained from a lysimeter-based 15N fertilizer mass balance approach, and to contextualize N2 emissions with 15N enrichment of N2 in soil air. For four sampling periods, fertilizer-derived N2 losses (15NGF method) were similar to unaccounted fertilizer N fates as obtained from the 15N mass balance approach. Total N2 emissions (15NGF method) amounted to 21 ± 3 kg N ha− 1, with 13 ± 2 kg N ha− 1 (7.5% of applied fertilizer N) originating from fertilizer. In comparison, the 15N mass balance approach overall indicated fertilizer-derived N2 emissions of 11%, equivalent to 18 ± 13 kg N ha− 1. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were small (0.15 ± 0.01 kg N ha− 1 or 0.1% of fertilizer N), resulting in a large mean N2:(N2O + N2) ratio of 0.94 ± 0.06. Due to the applied drip fertigation, ammonia emissions accounted for < 1% of fertilizer-N, while N leaching was negligible. The temporal variability of N2 emissions was well explained by the δ15N2 in soil air down to 50 cm depth. We conclude the 15NGF method provides realistic estimates of field N2 emissions and should be more widely used to better understand soil N2 losses. Moreover, combining soil air δ15N2 measurements with diffusion modeling might be an alternative approach for constraining soil N2 emissions.
Yankelzon et al. (Sat,) studied this question.