Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent years, additive manufacturing has become a regular process in various industries, and consequently there is an increasing need to evaluate the environmental aspects of this technology and its associated materials. In this paper, comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessments between a conventional product and a 3D-printed alternative made of polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA-wood material were investigated based on the standard ISO 14044:2006. The environmental impact of each product was quantified for 18 categories. The goal of life cycle assessment (LCA) was to determine whether the use of 3D printed PLA/PLA-wood products can be a sustainable alternative to traditional metal products. The paper presents a case study in which a comparative LCA was conducted. The results show that a metal part manufactured using conventional subtractive processes (milling, drilling, welding, etc.) has a higher environmental impact compared to 3D-printed alternatives made from renewable materials. However, there are many sub-issues that need to be adequately addressed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Teja Bizjak Govedič
Daša Krapež Tomec
Manja Kitek Kuzman
University of Ljubljana
Drvna industrija
University of Ljubljana
University of Belgrade
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Govedič et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e76029b6db6435876d6694 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2024.0107