Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Rewards are a broad category of stimuli inducing approach behavior to aid survival. Extensive evidence from animal research has shown that wanting (the motivation to pursue a reward) and liking (the pleasure associated with its consumption) are mostly regulated by dopaminergic and opioidergic activity in dedicated brain areas. However, less is known about the neuroanatomy of dopaminergic and opioidergic regulation of reward processing in humans, especially when considering different types of rewards (i.e., social and nonsocial). To fill this gap of knowledge, we combined dopaminergic and opioidergic antagonism (via amisulpride and naltrexone administration) with functional neuroimaging to investigate the neurochemical and neuroanatomical bases of wanting and liking of matched nonsocial (food) and social (interpersonal touch) rewards, using a randomized, between‐subject, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind design. While no drug effect was observed at the behavioral level, brain activity was modulated by the administered compounds. In particular, opioid antagonism, compared to placebo, reduced activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex during consumption of the most valued social and nonsocial rewards. Dopamine antagonism, however, had no clear effects on brain activity in response to reward anticipation. These findings provide insights into the neurobiology of human reward processing and suggest a similar opioidergic regulation of the neural responses to social and nonsocial reward consumption.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Claudia Massaccesi
Marche Polytechnic University
Sebastian Korb
University of Essex
Sebastian J. Götzendorfer
University of Vienna
Human Brain Mapping
Karolinska Institutet
University of Vienna
Medical University of Vienna
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Massaccesi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e761c9b6db6435876d7d97 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26645
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: