Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: No studies have identified combined biomarkers that may be more reasonable for the assessment of current chemo-immunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Methods: This study was conducted to investigate a combined biomarker with prognostic or predictive value in ES-SCLC. We determined the best independent prognostic biomarker among the four complete blood-count-derived inflammatory biomarkers (CBC-IBs). Subsequently, we analyzed the prognostic or predictive value of combining this independent CBC-IB with PD-L1 (SP142) expression. We prospectively assessed the SP142 analyses in tumor samples at diagnosis. Results: All in all, 55 patients with ES-SCLC were classified into four groups according to the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) (low/high) and SP142 (positive/negative). The best survival was observed in the low-SII/ SP142-positive group, whereas the worst survival was observed in the high-SII/SP142-negative group (p = 0.002). The combined SII-SP142 biomarker was better for predicting both survival and disease progression in patients with ES-SCLC. Conclusions: The combined SII-SP142 biomarker can be readily and universally obtained at a low cost in clinical practice, without requiring advanced genomics technology or specialized expertise. Although further studies are needed to confirm that the combined SII-SP142 biomarker is widely applicable, it should help clinicians to identify the best patients for combined chemotherapy with atezolizumab in ES-SCLC.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jong Min Baek
Hyungkeun Cha
Yeonsook Moon
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Catholic University of Korea
Inha University Hospital
Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Baek et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7579cb6db6435876cede7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051521
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: