Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Subduction earthquake cycles are known to produce distinctive patterns of crustal motion, providing critical insights into the details of plate interface coupling and rupture behavior. Retrieving these patterns in the Cascadia subduction zone poses a significant challenge, particularly because the 1700 great Cascadia earthquake (Mw>=9.0) occurred more than three centuries ago. Previous studies of the megathrust earthquake cycle along the Cascadia margin focused on either the geologically constrained coseismic rupture, or on the present-day interseismic coupling patterns based on geodetic observations. There thus is a gap in the comprehensive understanding of the earthquake cycle, particularly in the integration of available geological and geodetic evidence. Our study aims to bridge this gap and unify the insights preserved in both records. To do so, we develop a three-dimensional viscoelastic earthquake cycle model with realistic slab geometry, crustal thickness, and topography. We simulate the coseismic, postseismic, and interseismic stages of the earthquake cycle by alternately locking and releasing asperities, which are derived from geodetic coupling (Li et al., 2018) and geological rupture (Wang et al., 2013) studies. Our results show a good match to convergence-parallel interseismic velocities from the geodetic observations of McKenzie and Furlong (2021). Considering the subsidence signal in the geological record, a good fit can be obtained by a combination of coseismic slip and early afterslip. We find that our results are largely determined by the slab geometry, although factors like asperity configurations, downdip limits of the slab-crust interface, and mantle viscosity structure influence the model predictions.
Qin et al. (Fri,) studied this question.