Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent years, the concept of authoritarianism has risen to prominence in the community of legal scholars studying non-democratic regimes. China's legality is also described as authoritarian. However, what does it mean to label China as having a system of authoritarian law? The concept of authoritarianism, and by extension, authoritarian legality, is yet underexamined. This article discusses how China, as a single-party state, differs from other authoritarian regimes in developing its own brand of authoritarian legality that I describe as legal gradationalism. China's authoritarian legality is characterized by a rejection of judicial independence and the mixing of law and quasi-law instruments. Drawing from Shucheng Wang's Law as an Instrument, I propose that a gradationalist approach to Chinese legality allows us to more fully understand the behaviour of Chinese courts and the intriguing dynamics between the Supreme People's Court (SPC) and the local courts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kwai Hang Ng (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e74b97b6db6435876c439c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2024.2323806
Kwai Hang Ng
University of California System
Asia Pacific Law Review
University of California, San Diego
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...