In dogs (Canis familiaris), social stimulus overshadows nonsocial stimulus, and stronger attachment correlates with responses to the latter

Abstract The emotional reactivity hypothesis predicts that reduced fear and aggression in domesticated animals improves their social cognitive abilities toward humans. However, no studies in dogs (Canis familiaris) have shown that higher individual temperament is associated with higher social cognitive abilities, such as human pointing. In this study, we first trained dogs to learn correct responses in a two-choice task using a compound stimulus consisting of social (human pointing) and nonsocial stimuli (printed figures on paper) as cues. Social and nonsocial stimuli were presented alone to examine whether the social stimulus overshadowed the nonsocial stimulus. We also examined the correlation between temperament scores based on the Canine Behavioral Assessment & Research Questionnaire (C-BARQ) and task performance. The results showed that social stimuli overshadowed nonsocial stimuli in most dogs, indicating that dogs used social stimuli from humans more frequently than nonsocial stimuli. Strong positive correlations were observed between attachment scores and correct response rates to nonsocial stimuli, but there was no correlation between aggression/fear and correct response rates to social stimuli. We considered that positive correlations in attachment scores and correct response rates to nonsocial stimuli indicate the degree of individual attentiveness to various environmental stimuli, that responses to human pointing are likely to be reinforced from an early age. In addition, individual fear and aggression and social cognitive abilities can vary separately.