Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Security logs are the key to understanding attacks and diagnosing vulnerabilities. Often coming in the form of text logs, their analysis remains a daunting challenge. Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated unmatched potential in understanding natural and programming languages. The question arises as to whether and how LMs could be also used to automatise the analysis of security logs. We here systematically study how to benefit from the state-of-the-art LM to support the analysis of text-like Unix shell attack logs automatically. For this, we thoroughly designed LogPrécis. LogPrécis receives as input malicious shell sessions. It then automatically identifies and assigns the attacker tactic to each portion of the session, i.e., unveiling the sequence of the attacker's goals. This creates a unique attack fingerprint. We demonstrate LogPrécis capability to support the analysis of two large datasets containing about 400,000 unique Unix shell attacks recorded in a 2-year-long honeypot deployment. LogPrécis reduces the analysis to about 3,000 unique fingerprints. Such abstraction lets us better understand attacks, extract attack prototypes, detect novelties, and track families and mutations. Overall, LogPrécis, released as open source, demonstrates the potential of adopting LMs for security analysis and paves the way for better and more responsive defence against cyberattacks.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matteo Boffa
Polytechnic University of Turin
Idílio Drago
Polytechnic University of Turin
Marco Mellia
Polytechnic University of Turin
Computers & Security
University of Turin
Polytechnic University of Turin
Huawei Technologies (France)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Boffa et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7433fb6db6435876bc0e1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.103805
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: