Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The article presents a detailed comparative analysis of translations of twelve great Ukrainian poet Ivan Franko's poems done by translator Percival Cundy and the GPT-3.5 AI language model. Using various manual and automatic analytical research methods and techniques, we analyzed the translations' merits, demerits, and eight essential qualitative and quantitative linguistic and poetic characteristics to verify a hypothesis that human and GPT-3.5-driven machine translations can be quite comparable in terms of their quality and poetic features. The results obtained sufficiently prove the hypothesis and suggest that developing AI translation potential for poetry translation can help build more capable, diversified, and nuanced large language models. The AI revolutionary breakthrough in translation makes it quite possible to acquaint satisfactorily the wider public with the poetic heritage of the world's nations, especially those using minor languages, whose poetry is evidently under-translated. A follow-up study is desirable to assess the progress made by GPT4.0 and its possible later versions in poetry translation, as compared with GPT-3.5.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Viacheslav Karaban
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Anna Karaban
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Forum for Linguistic Studies
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Karaban et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f7caa92676d5461fcc0cf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i1.1994
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: