Abstract 1008: Pilot evaluation of an online course for primary care providers on preparing patients for cancer discussions with their oncologists

Abstract Introduction: Cancer clinical trial (CCT) accrual is only 5-8%, and barriers to participate can be more acute for underserved groups. Enrollment of racial/ethnic minorities, older adults, adolescents, and young adults is not adequate to understand treatment outcomes unique to these populations. Education before seeing an oncologist can increase patients’ willingness to ask and consider receiving treatment through a CCT. Because primary care providers (PCPs) interact with patients during diagnosis, provide ongoing care, and are a trusted source of information, they can educate and normalize inquiries about therapeutic CCTs. The aim of this study was to pilot test an innovative, tailored online CCT course for PCPs. Methods: To participate, PCPs (MD, DO, NP, or PA) had to provide care in an outpatient setting, refer patients to a cancer treatment specialist in the past year, and be an English speaker residing in the U. S. or its territories. PCPs were recruited from Clinical Directors Network, University of Pennsylvania, and University of Florida. The 1-hour online course includes four modules hosted by a PCP and radiation oncologist with video segments of a CCT expert who summarized CCT recruitment research. Participants interact with patient scenarios and learn about the patient’s cancer diagnosis and medical/personal background. Videos of actors playing the roles of patient and doctor demonstrate communication skills taught in the course. PCPs completed short surveys prior to and immediately after completing the course. Results: 28 PCPs participated. PCPs were mainly MDs (88. 9%), residents (17, 60. 7%), White (46. 4%), non-Hispanic/Latino (92. 9%), and 50% women. Mean knowledge of CCTs scores (0-100%) increased significantly from pre (M=56. 7, SD=17. 5) to post (M=82. 1, SD=12; p. 001) indicating that PCPs answered more true/false statements about CCTs correctly after training. Using a 1-5 scale with 5=strongly agree, PCPs’ attitudes and beliefs scores also increased significantly from pre (M=4. 2, SD=. 6) to post (4. 7, SD=. 4, p. 001) indicating that PCPs were more likely to agree they have a role in their patients’ cancer treatment, including CCTs, after training. Using the same scale, PCPs’ willingness to communicate about CCTs increased significantly from pre (M=4. 4, SD=. 5) to post (M=4. 7, SD=. 5, p=. 007), indicating that PCPs were more willing to engage with patients diagnosed with cancer before referring them to a cancer specialist after training. Conclusions: Significant pilot findings in knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and communication scores demonstrate that the online course was effective at educating PCPs about CCTs, and improving PCPs’ attitudes about the CCT referral process, and their willingness to engage in their patients’ cancer care. Future research will include a larger sample and explore the course’s impact on PCP’s referral behavior. Citation Format: Alyssa Crowe, Elisa S. Weiss, Margo Michaels, Domenic Durante, Maria Sae-Hau, Andrea Cassells, Carla L. Fisher, Jason Arnold, Taylor Vasquez, Ana Natale-Pereira, Raymond Mailhot, Zhongyue Zhang, Carma L. Bylund. Pilot evaluation of an online course for primary care providers on preparing patients for cancer discussions with their oncologists abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts) ; 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84 (6Suppl): Abstract nr 1008.