Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background: Access to breast cancer screening mammogram services decreased in association with the COVID-19 pandemic. There is also evidence for increases in late-stage breast cancer diagnoses. Our objectives were to determine: 1) the COVID-19-affected period on mammogram screening, 2) the proportion of pandemic-associated missed or delayed mammogram screening visits overall and by race/ethnicity and age group, and 3) evidence for pandemic-associated shifts in diagnosis stage. Methods: Screening mammogram encounter data between 1-1-2019 and 12-31-2022 were extracted from EPIC for females ≥ 40 years old for the screening analysis. We used Bayesian state space models to describe weekly screening mammogram counts, modeling an interruption that phased in and out from 3-1-2020 to 9-1-2020. We used the posterior predictive distribution to simulate differences between a predicted, uninterrupted process and the observed screening mammogram counts. Breast cancer diagnoses at ≥ 21 years from the tumor registry between 12-1-2018 and 11-30-2021 were included in the stage analysis. We used logistic regression models to estimate late-stage diagnosis odds comparing matched three-month periods during the pandemic to before the pandemic. Results: A total of 319, 492 encounters among 146, 644 women were included. Model-estimated screening mammograms dropped by 98. 8% (95% CI 95. 1 to 100) between 3-15-2020 and 5-24-2020, returning to pre-pandemic levels or higher after this period. Drops in screening mammogram encounters did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity or age group (p. 75). Among 4, 669 breast cancer diagnoses, we found no significant differences in the odds of late-stage diagnoses for any period vs. the same period before the pandemic (Table). Conclusions: These data suggest a short-term pandemic effect on screening mammograms. Evidence for increases in late-stage diagnoses is limited. These results may inform future pandemic planning. OR (95% CI) Period comparison 1. 19 (0. 74 to 1. 91) 3/2020 to 5/2020 vs. 3/2019 to 5/2019 1. 05 (0. 69 to 1. 60) 6/2020 to 8/2020 vs. 6/2019 to 8/2019 1. 14 (0. 73 to 1. 78) 9/2020 to 11/2020 vs. 9/2019 to 11/2019 0. 92 (0. 60 to 1. 41) 12/2020 to 2/2021 vs. 12/2019 to 2/2020 1. 08 (0. 71 to 1. 65) 3/2021 to 5/2021 vs. 3/2019 to 5/2019 0. 89 (0. 59 to 1. 33) 6/2021 to 8/2021 vs. 6/2019 to 8/2019 1. 31 (0. 84 to 2. 04) 9/2021 to 11/2021 vs. 9/2019 to 11/2019 Citation Format: Kimberly J. Johnson, RJ Waken, Caitlin P. O'Connell, Derek Brown. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening and diagnosis stage in a large midwestern United States academic medical center abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts) ; 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84 (6Suppl): Abstract nr 4797.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kimberly Johnson
R. J. Waken
Caitlin P. O’Connell
Cancer Research
Washington University in St. Louis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Johnson et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72e37b6db6435876a7f58 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-4797