Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background: Aging, smoking and germline predisposition are known to accelerate leukemogenesis. However, the the ability for myeloid clonal pathogenic variants (MCPV) to elicit an antigen-driven host antileukemia immune response is not well characterized. A better understanding on how cellular immunity selectively discriminates leukemia-related “neopeptides” could uncover mechanisms supporting tumor genome evolution. Methods: 122 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were included and 111 had available protein coding sequences. A neopeptide library was created using protein FASTA coding extracted for individual myeloid clonal mutations via National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Patient class 1 HLA typing was obtained through Tempus, and Genomic Testing Cooperative laboratories. Prediction of number and strength of AML neopeptide bindings to MHC class I molecules were obtained via NetMHCPan-1. Analysis was performed with K-means algorithm assigning age at diagnosis, detected MCPV, number of neopeptides binding (as continuous variable), overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) as variables. Unsupervised data input allowed 3 cluster partitions for differential survivals allowing HLA class 1 peptide binding aggregation with potential roles in leukemogenesis and patient outcome. Descriptive statistics were performed with SAS. Results: Sixty-six different MCPV were detected. Of 111 patients, 70 (63%) with available MCPV produced at least 1 MHC I neopeptide binding. Frequently observed variants were P53 (13%), FLT3 (9. 2%), WT1 (7%), DNMT3A (6. 5%), RAS (5%), ASXL1 (4. 3%), RUNX1 (4. 2%), NPM1 (4. 2%) and IDH1/2 (2. 6%). Cluster 2 demonstrated a lack of favorable and higher proportion of adverse ELN 2022 subgroups. Cluster 3 exhibited a higher of P53 p=0. 03 and MDS-related mutations. OS was 79, 239, and 1551 days for cluster 2, 1 and 3, respectively p=0. 0001. EFS was 134, 363 and 451 days for cluster 2, 1 and 3, respectively p=0. 0001. Interestingly, Cluster 2 and 3 assembled the highest probability for peptide binding 1 v 2 v 3 = 1. 76% v 36. 6% v 62%, p=0. 01. Lastly, albeit in low frequencies, higher diversity of DNA repairing enzymes was seen in cluster 2. Conclusions: Different MCPV arising in AML genome are variably immunogenic and leukemia-related neopeptide binding’s ability is differentially expressed in our 3 clusters. Frequent neopeptide bindings in clusters 2 and 3 may reflect higher AML immunogenicity resulting in genomic instability. It is possible that less “edited” genomes in cluster 1 preserve higher chemosensitivity resulting in better OS, while highly edited genomes in cluster 2 and 3 are less chemo-sensitive and circumvent host immunosurveillance. Further expansion of cluster 2 is necessary to better understand the role of DNA repairing enzymes in younger patients’ outcomes, especially when genomic instability is observed. Citation Format: Paul Sackstein, Sarah Mudra, Lacey Williams, Garrett Diltz, Rachel Zemel, Sravanti Teegavarapu, Martha Mims, Catherine Lai, Kimberley Doucette, Anne Renteria, Olga Timofeeva, Gustavo A. Rivero. Investigating human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class 1 leukemogenic pathways in acute myelogenous leukemia abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts) ; 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84 (6Suppl): Abstract nr 5377.
Sackstein et al. (Fri,) studied this question.