Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background: BRAF, a key modulator of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway, is observed in 7% of all cancers. Therapeutic response to MAPK inhibition (MAPKi) often relies on molecular distinctions between members of varying classes: Class 1 (V600), Class 2 and 3 (non-V600) BRAF mutants. Preliminary data indicates that co-occurring RAS mutations in non-V600 BRAF mutant cancers are less responsive to MAPKi treatment. This emphasizes the need to investigate the characteristics of RAS co-mutations in non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors. Methods: Genomic data was obtained from a cohort of 183, 292 patients provided by the AACR GENIE database (v14. 1). Patient samples were clustered according to their BRAF mutation status and co-occurring K/NRAS mutations: WT BRAF (n=60, 845) vs. non-V600 BRAF (n=1009). Samples were grouped based on cancer type: melanoma (n=3841), colorectal (n=15, 434), and non-small cell lung cancer (n=14640) and were further categorized according to key biochemical features of RAS GTPase function and overall GTPase activity. Results: This dataset revealed a diverse array of allelic variants of K/NRAS between cancer types and their underlying BRAF mutation status (Table 1). Non-V600 BRAF mutant cancers showed an enrichment for KRAS mutations linked to amplified nucleotide exchange (37. 9% vs. 13. 4%; p0. 0001) and hydrolysis-impairing NRAS mutations (41. 9% vs. 23%; p0. 0001), compared to WT BRAF cancers. Rare allelic variants including KRAS L19F, KRAS A146T, and NRAS G60E were seen in Class 2/3 BRAF mutants. Conclusion: This data suggests that non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors are characterized by a unique distribution of RAS mutations. More research into the difference in downstream effectors of RAS mutants overrepresented in non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors could provide important insights into how these tumors develop and resist targeted therapies. Table 1. Classification of KRAS and NRAS mutations in WT BRAF vs. non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors GTPase Function Cancer Type All cancers NSCLC Colorectal Melanoma BRAF mutation WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value KRASmutation class Impaired hydrolysis n=20731 (79. 8%) n=167 (51. 9%) 0. 0001 n=6068 (86. 1%) n=60 (56. 6%) 0. 0001 n=4799 (68. 2%) n=16 (29. 1%) 0. 0001 n=38 (48. 1%) n=13 (50. 0%) 0. 4047 Nucleotide Exchange n=3475 (13. 4%) n=122 (37. 9%) n=530 (7. 5%) n=36 (34. 0%) n=1842 (26. 2%) n=36 (65. 5%) n=30 (38. 0%) n=12 (46. 2%) Hybrid n=1765 (6. 8%) n=33 (10. 2%) n=446 (6. 3%) n=10 (9. 4%) n=395 (5. 6%) n=3 (5. 5%) n=11 (13. 9%) n=1 (3. 8%) NRAS mutation class Impaired hydrolysis n = 974 (23. 0%) n=78 (41. 9%) 0. 0001 n=29 (18. 7%) n=9 (39. 1%) 0. 0196 n=188 (32. 6%) n=17 (68. 0%) 0. 0001 n=86 (5. 5%) n=22 (27. 8%) 0. 0001 Nucleotide Exchange n=459 (10. 8%) n=22 (11. 8%) n=5 (3. 2%) n=2 (8. 7%) n=48 (8. 3%) n=4 (16. 0%) n=93 (5. 9%) n=10 (12. 7%) Hybrid n=2811 (66. 2%) n=86 (46. 2%) n=121 (78. 1%) n=12 (52. 2%) n=341 (59. 1%) n=4 (16. 0%) n=1385 (88. 6%) n=47 (59. 5%) GTPase Activity BRAF mutation WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value WT non-V600 p-value KRASmutation class Intermediate activity n=14408 (55. 3%) n=142 (44. 4%) 0. 0001 n=5082 (72. 3%) n=54 (50. 5%) 0. 0001 n=3540 (49. 9%) n=17 (31. 5%) 0. 0089 n=46 (56. 8%) n=13 (50. 0%) 0. 6516 High activity n=11630 (44. 7%) n=178 (55. 6%) n=1947 (27. 7%) n=53 (49. 5%) n=3552 (50. 1%) n=37 (68. 5%) n=35 (43. 2%) n=13 (50. 0%) NRAS mutation class Intermediate activity n=1364 (32. 2%) n=101 (55. 8%) 0. 0001 n=36 (23. 4%) n=12 (54. 5%) 0. 0041 n=239 (41. 8%) n=20 (87. 0%) 0. 0001 n=190 (12. 3%) n=34 (43. 0%) 0. 0001 High activity n=2868 (67. 8%) n=80 (44. 2%) n=118 (76. 6%) n=10 (45. 5%) n=333 (58. 2%) n=3 (13. 0%) n=1357 (87. 7%) n=45 (57. 0%) Citation Format: Chantel L. Mukonoweshuro, Emmanuelle Rousselle, April A. Rose. Exploring the mutational landscape of KRAS and NRAS in tumors with non-V600 BRAF mutations abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts) ; 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84 (6Suppl): Abstract nr 5063.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chantel L. Mukonoweshuro
Emmanuelle Rousselle
April A. N. Rose
Cancer Research
Jewish General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mukonoweshuro et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72e40b6db6435876a8518 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-5063