Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract We analyze the performance of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and UK Met Office (UKMO) meteorological models in predicting offshore blowing wind in coastal areas. Our attention is mainly on the Mediterranean coast, up to 200 km distance from the shore. We compare forecast neutral winds with Advanced Scatterometer measurements. The results indicate that the ECMWF forecasts systematically underestimate wind speed with respect to scatterometer data, while the UKMO model tends to overestimate. A cross‐analysis suggests that, better than fetch, model biases are a function of the model horizontal discretization, hence of the number of grid steps the wind runs over the sea. The steepness and roughness of the land orography before entering the sea, together with the related drag parameters, appear to have a strong role in determining the coastal offshore wind values. Surface drag over land tends to reduce the related wind speed, and it takes a few grid points to adjust to the smooth sea surface conditions. This is supported by a detailed study with a high resolution grid, but different orography resolutions. In these simulations, practically identical coastal wind speed distributions are found when the subgrid orography schemes are switched off. Vertical cross‐sections of potential temperature and wind in bora and mistral conditions illustrate the strong role of gravity waves, wind channeling and turbulent diffusion in coastal numerical weather prediction. Besides local wave modeling, this may be relevant for offshore wind farms, typically situated within 5–50 km from the coast.
Cavaleri et al. (Sat,) studied this question.