Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), establishing itself as a primary approach to solving complex reasoning tasks. Existing CoT synthesis approaches usually focus on simpler reasoning tasks and thus result in low-quality and inconsistent CoT prompts. In response to this challenge, we present an empirical investigation of CoT prompting and introduce CoTGenius, a novel framework designed for the automatic generation of superior CoT prompts. CoTGenius is developed based on three major evolution strategies, i.e., complicate, diversify, and specify-alongside two filtering mechanisms: evolutionary success judgement and correctness verification. We further employ CoTGenius to create an extensive CoT dataset, and subsequently fine-tune the Llama 2-Chat 7B and 13B models on this dataset. We call the resulting model ChainLM. To deal with the cumulative error issue in reasoning steps, we propose a step-level debating method, wherein multiple debaters discuss each reasoning step to arrive at the correct answer. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our ChainLM models exhibit enhanced proficiency in addressing a spectrum of complex reasoning problems compared to existing models. In addition, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the impact of data categories within CoTGenius on the model performance. We release our dataset and code at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/ChainLM.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiaoxue Cheng
Junyi Li
Wayne Xin Zhao
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cheng et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7309eb6db6435876aa7cc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2403.14312
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: