Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In response to calls for public engagement on human genome editing (HGE), which intensified after the 2018 He Jiankui scandal that resulted in the implantation of genetically modified embryos, we detail an anticipatory approach to the governance of HGE. By soliciting multidisciplinary experts' input on the drivers and uncertainties of HGE development, we developed a set of plausible future scenarios to ascertain publics values-specifically, their hopes and concerns regarding the novel technology and its applications. In turn, we gathered a subset of multidisciplinary experts to propose governance recommendations for HGE that incorporate identified publics' values. These recommendations include: (1) continued participatory public engagement; (2) international harmonization and transparency of multiple governance levers such as professional and scientific societies, funders, and regulators; and (3) development of a formal whistleblower framework.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dorit Barlevy
Eric T. Juengst
Jeffrey Kahn
Science and Public Policy
Harvard University
University of California, Berkeley
Johns Hopkins University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Barlevy et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72758b6db6435876a08e8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae010