Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The concept of Bayesian active learning has recently been introduced from machine learning to structural reliability analysis. Although several specific methods have been successfully developed, significant efforts are still needed to fully exploit their potential and to address existing challenges. This work proposes a quasi-Bayesian active learning method, called 'Quasi-Bayesian Active Learning Cubature', for structural reliability analysis with extremely small failure probabilities. The method is established based on a cleaver use of the Bayesian failure probability inference framework. To reduce the computational burden associated with the exact posterior variance of the failure probability, we propose a quasi posterior variance instead. Then, two critical elements for Bayesian active learning, namely the stopping criterion and the learning function, are developed subsequently. The stopping criterion is defined based on the quasi posterior coefficient of variation of the failure probability, whose numerical solution scheme is also tailored. The learning function is extracted from the quasi posterior variance, with the introduction of an additional parameter that allows multi-point selection and hence parallel distributed processing. By testing on four numerical examples, it is empirically shown that the proposed method can assess extremely small failure probabilities with desired accuracy and efficiency.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chao Dang
TU Dortmund University
Alice Cicirello
University of Cambridge
Marcos A. Valdebenito
TU Dortmund University
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
University of Cambridge
University of Liverpool
Tongji University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7242fb6db64358769dc14 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103613
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: