Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Cover cropping plays an important role in Integrated Weed Management (IWM). Weed suppression of cover crops occurs by competition, physical barrier on the soil and allelopathy. Under favourable growing conditions, cover crops can provide similar weed suppression in the autumn‐to‐spring period as repeated stubble tillage and non‐selective herbicides. The objective of this study was to test if cover crop species with higher allelopathic potential can suppress weeds in the field with less shoot biomass than cover crop species with lower allelopathic effects. Data of cover crop shoot biomass, percentage of weed suppression in the field and reduction of weed seed germination in petri‐dish bioassays treated with cover crop extracts were analysed from 11 experiments. Weed suppression in relation to cover crop biomass was better predicted by a Weibul three‐parameter model than with the Cousens model. Raphanus sativus var. oleiferus , Sinapis alba , Fagopyrum esculentum and Phacelia tanacetifolia needed at least three‐fold more biomass than Avena strigosa for 80% weed suppression. Vicia sativa had the lowest weed reduction of only 62%. Aqueous extracts of A. strigosa had the highest inhibiting effect on weed seed germination followed by R. sativus . The lowest effect was observed for P. tanacetifolia . It is assumed that for A. strigosa allelopathy strongly contributes to weed suppression whereas for P. tanacetifolia and other cover crops, competition plays the major role for weed suppression. The model can help growers and consultants to mix cover crop species for the autumn‐to‐spring period. Under dry conditions, species such as A. strigosa can provide high weed suppression with low biomass. Under moist conditions, rapidly growing cover crops such as S. alba suppress most weeds and deliver high biomass.
Gerhards et al. (Thu,) studied this question.