Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
With an increasing share of renewable energies, flexibility is becoming an important factor to ensure the German electricity grid stability. Therefore, decision-makers have to deal with the implementation of the necessary transformations and adaptions. To provide an indication, a cost–benefit analysis and comparison of grid-stabilizing energy flexibility options and their applications for a current and an outlook scenario is conducted. In the results, due to its low costs, the flexibilization of existing CHP (combined heat and power generation) plants stands out as a particularly attractive option. Similarly, the flexibilization of existing wind turbines and photovoltaic systems, as well as the flexibilization of small heat pumps, appear to be highly attractive in the outlook (integration is enabled by pooling). Furthermore, in the future, large-scale batteries and PEM (Polymer electrolyte membrane) electrolysis as well as controlled charging (pooling) will become increasingly beneficial for the energy system. The overall worst performing flexibility option is power-to-methane, which requires additional effort from the system in both scenarios. In general, the research showed that even for similar flexibility options, the resulting systemic benefit highly depends on the specific flexibility application. Nonetheless, the results give an indication towards important sources of flexibility and further research priorities.
Ackermann et al. (Sat,) studied this question.