Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract We introduce semi-flexible majority rules for public good provision with private valuations. Such rules take the form of a two-stage, multiple-round voting mechanism where the output of the first stage is the default alternative for the second stage and the vote-share thresholds used in every round of binary voting (a) vary with the alternative on the table for a public-good level and (b) require a qualified majority for approving the alternative on the table by stopping the procedure. We show that these mechanisms implement the ex post utilitarian optimal public-good level, provided valuations can only be high or low. This public-good level is chosen after all potential socially optimal alternatives have been picked for a voting round. We explore ways to reduce the number of voting rounds and develop a compound mechanism when there are three or more valuation types.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hans Gersbach
Ifo Institute for Economic Research
Oriol Tejada
Clínica Diagonal
Social Choice and Welfare
ETH Zurich
Universitat de Barcelona
Swiss Finance Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gersbach et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70b47b6db643587685426 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-024-01508-3