Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
No AccessUrology PracticeClinical Research2 Apr 2024Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Smokers: A Comprehensive Analysis Using a National Behavioral SurveyThis article is commented on by the following: Editorial Comment I. Mitchell Harmatz, Khalid Y. Alkhatib, Morgan Leff, José I. Nolazco, Katharine F. Michel, Michelle Slinger, Nathaniel McLauchlan, Brian D. Cortese, Daniel S. Roberson, Benjamin Schurhamer, Daniel J. Lee, S. Bruce Malkowicz, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Thomas J. Guzzo, and Phillip M. Pierorazio I. Mitchell HarmatzI. Mitchell Harmatz https: //orcid. org/0000-0003-0313-5325, Khalid Y. AlkhatibKhalid Y. Alkhatib Corresponding Author: Khalid Y. Alkhatib, MD, MMSc, Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N 39th St, Suite 300 MOB, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (email protected), (email protected) https: //orcid. org/0000-0002-6008-0503, Morgan LeffMorgan Leff https: //orcid. org/0009-0002-2453-4181, José I. NolazcoJosé I. Nolazco https: //orcid. org/0000-0002-0239-6542, Katharine F. MichelKatharine F. Michel https: //orcid. org/0000-0002-8499-7869, Michelle SlingerMichelle Slinger, Nathaniel McLauchlanNathaniel McLauchlan https: //orcid. org/0000-0001-6749-5288, Brian D. CorteseBrian D. Cortese https: //orcid. org/0000-0002-8523-8151, Daniel S. RobersonDaniel S. Roberson https: //orcid. org/0000-0002-6817-853X, Benjamin SchurhamerBenjamin Schurhamer, Daniel J. LeeDaniel J. Lee, S. Bruce MalkowiczS. Bruce Malkowicz, Quoc-Dien TrinhQuoc-Dien Trinh https: //orcid. org/0000-0003-3857-9276, Trinity J. BivalacquaTrinity J. Bivalacqua https: //orcid. org/0000-0002-0870-4366, Thomas J. GuzzoThomas J. Guzzo, and Phillip M. PierorazioPhillip M. Pierorazio https: //orcid. org/0000-0003-0766-9981 View All Author Informationhttps: //doi. org/10. 1097/UPJ. 0000000000000553AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Introduction: Cigarette smoking is associated with higher-risk prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis and increased overall and prostate cancer‒specific mortality. Previous studies indicate smokers are less likely to undergo PSA screening. Herein we investigate the association between smoking and PSA screening using a nationally representative US survey. We hypothesize that smokers are less likely to undergo guideline-concordant PSA screening. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of men aged 55 to 69 who responded to the cigarette smoking and PSA screening questions of the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey. Adjusted prevalence and adjusted risk differences were calculated using complex weighted multivariable Poisson regression modeling. Results: We identified 58, 996 individuals who qualified for analysis. PSA screening prevalence was 39% (95% CI: 39%-40%) nationally, 42% (95% CI: 41%-44%) for never smokers, 42% (95% CI: 39%-40%) for former smokers, and 27% (95% CI: 25%-29%) for current smokers, including 27% (95% CI: 24%-29%) for daily smokers and 29% (95% CI: 24%-33%) for nondaily smokers. Compared to never smokers, the adjusted relative risk for undergoing PSA screening was 0. 81 for current smokers (95% CI: 0. 75-0. 88, P <. 01) and 0. 99 for former smokers (95% CI: 0. 94-1. 03, P =. 53). Conclusions: Current smokers are less likely to undergo recommended PSA screening, but former smokers are screened at similar rates as never smokers. As delays in diagnosis may substantially contribute to worse prostate cancer outcomes, targeted interventions to increase screening in this population may yield significant effects. References 1. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2014 Surgeon General's Report: The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Office on Smoking and Health; 2014. Google Scholar 2. . Tobacco product use among adults—United States, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023; 72 (18): 475-483. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3. . Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68 (1): 31-54. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4. Cancer in North America. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. 2022. Accessed November 1, 2023. https: //www. naaccr. org/cancer-in-north-america-cina-volumes/ Google Scholar 5. . Smoking and prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. 2015; 1 (1): 28-38. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 6. . Tobacco smoking and survival after a prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018; 70: 30-40. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 7. . A systematic review and meta-analysis of tobacco use and prostate cancer mortality and incidence in prospective cohort studies. Eur Urol. 2014; 66 (6): 1054-1064. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 8. ; Consortium on Health and Ageing: Network of Cohorts in Europe and the United States CHANCES. Quantification of the smoking-associated cancer risk with rate advancement periods: meta-analysis of individual participant data from cohorts of the CHANCES consortium. BMC Med. 2016; 14 (62): 62. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 9. . Tobacco smoking and death from prostate cancer in US veterans. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020; 23 (2): 252-259. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 10. . Smoking and prostate cancer survival and recurrence. JAMA. 2011; 305 (24): 2548-2555. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 11. . Cigarette smoking is associated with an increased risk of biochemical disease recurrence, metastasis, castration-resistant prostate cancer, and mortality after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. Cancer. 2014; 120 (2): 197-204. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 12. . Smoking and risk of low- and high-grade prostate cancer: results from the REDUCE study. Clin Cancer Res Official. 2014; 20 (20): 5331-5338. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 13. . Smoking is associated with acute and chronic prostatic inflammation: results from the REDUCE study. Cancer Prev Res. 2015; 8 (4): 312-317. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 14. . Prostate tumor DNA methylation is associated with cigarette smoking and adverse prostate cancer outcomes. Cancer. 2016; 122 (14): 2168-2177. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 15. . Cigarette smoke induces nuclear translocation of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) in prostate cancer cells: nuclear HO-1 promotes vascular endothelial growth factor secretion. Int J Oncol. 2013; 42 (6): 1919-1928. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 16. . Smoking and risk of prostate cancer and prostate cancer death: a pooled study. Eur Urol. 2023; 83 (5): 422-431. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 17. . Association of cigarette smoking habits with the risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23 (1): 1150. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 18. . Smokers: at risk for prostate cancer but unlikely to screen. Addict Behav. 2012; 37 (6): 736-738. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 19. . Association between smoking status, and free, total and percent free prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 2012; 187 (4): 1228-1233. Link, Google Scholar 20. . Lifestyle factors and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in UK Biobank: implications for epidemiological research. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016; 45: 40-46. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 21. 2018 BRFSS survey data and documentation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. Accessed July 16, 2023. https: //www. cdc. gov/brfss/annualdata/annual₂018. html Google Scholar 22. ; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018; 319 (18): 1901-1913. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 23. . Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2013; 190 (2): 419-426. Link, Google Scholar 24. . Unweighted regression models perform better than weighted regression techniques for respondent-driven sampling data: results from a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19 (1): 202. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 25. . Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157 (10): 940-943. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 26. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149 (3): 185-191. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 27. ; U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157 (2): 120-134. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 28. . Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part II: recent changes in prostate cancer trends and disease characteristics. Cancer. 2018; 124 (13): 2801-2814. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 29. . Prostate-specific antigen screening and recent increases in advanced prostate cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021; 5 (1): pkaa098. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 30. . Increasing incidence of metastatic prostate cancer in the United States (2004-2013). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016; 19 (4): 395-397. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 31. . Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev. 2011; 33 (1): 135-147. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 32. . Smoking is associated with pessimistic and avoidant beliefs about cancer: results from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership. Br J Cancer. 2015; 112 (11): 1799-1804. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 33. . Who's still smoking? Disparities in adult cigarette smoking prevalence in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68 (2): 106-115. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 34. . Does veteran status mitigate racial disparities in prostate cancer screening? Analysis of prostate specific antigen screening patterns in the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. J Urol. 2022; 207 (5): 993-1000. Link, Google Scholar 35. . Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication. Health Expect. 2017; 20 (4): 563-573. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 36. . Relationship between cigarette use and prostate cancer risk: what do we know and what should we do? . Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023; 26 (3): 516-518. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 37. ; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014; 384 (9959): 2027-2035. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 38. . Reasons for quitting: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for smoking cessation in a population-based sample of smokers. Addict Behav. 1997; 22 (6): 727-739. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 39. . Reasons for quitting smoking in young adult cigarette smokers. Addict Behav. 2018; 77: 28-33. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 40. . Reasons to quit and barriers to quitting smoking in US young adults. Fam Pract. 2016; 33 (2): 133-139. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 41. . Population-level assessment of smoking-related beliefs and behaviors among survivors of genitourinary cancers: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Urology. 2021; 154: 215-220. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 42. . Reliability and validity of self-reported smoking in an anonymous online survey with young adults. Health Psychol. 2011; 30 (6): 693-701. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar Recusal: Dr Pierorazio is an AUA publications online content editor and was recused from the editorial and peer review processes. Funding/Support: Dr Trinh reported receiving research funding from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer Global Medical (Prostate Cancer Disparities grant 63354905), and the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (Health Disparity research award No. PC220551). Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Trinh reported consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer, Intuitive Surgical, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. No other disclosures were reported. Ethics Statement: This study was deemed exempt from Institutional Review Board review. Author Contributions: Conception and design: Alkhatib, Harmatz, Nolazco, Pierorazio. Data analysis and interpretation: Alkhatib, Harmatz, Pierorazio. Drafting the manuscript: Alkhatib, Harmatz, Leff, Nolazco, Michel, Slinger, McLauchlan, Cortese, Roberson, Pierorazio. Critical revision of the manuscript for scientific and factual content: Nolazco, Roberson, Lee, Schurhamer, Trinh, Malkowicz. Statistical analysis: Alkhatib, Harmatz. Supervision: Bivalacqua, Guzzo, Pierorazio. Data Availability: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The results of this study were presented as an abstract at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Society of Urologic Oncology, November 28 to December 1, 2023. © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesUrology Practice13 Mar 2024Editorial Comment Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Keywordscigarette smokingprostate-specific antigenprostatic neoplasmspreventive medicinesmoking cessationMetrics Author Information I. Mitchell Harmatz Co-first authors. More articles by this author Khalid Y. Alkhatib Corresponding Author: Khalid Y. Alkhatib, MD, MMSc, Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N 39th St, Suite 300 MOB, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (email protected), (email protected) Co-first authors. More articles by this author Morgan Leff More articles by this author José I. Nolazco More articles by this author Katharine F. Michel More articles by this author Michelle Slinger More articles by this author Nathaniel McLauchlan More articles by this author Brian D. Cortese More articles by this author Daniel S. Roberson More articles by this author Benjamin Schurhamer More articles by this author Daniel J. Lee More articles by this author S. Bruce Malkowicz More articles by this author Quoc-Dien Trinh More articles by this author Trinity J. Bivalacqua More articles by this author Thomas J. Guzzo More articles by this author Phillip M. Pierorazio More articles by this author Expand All Recusal: Dr Pierorazio is an AUA publications online content editor and was recused from the editorial and peer review processes. Funding/Support: Dr Trinh reported receiving research funding from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer Global Medical (Prostate Cancer Disparities grant 63354905), and the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (Health Disparity research award No. PC220551). Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Trinh reported consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer, Intuitive Surgical, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. No other disclosures were reported. Ethics Statement: This study was deemed exempt from Institutional Review Board review. Author Contributions: Conception and design: Alkhatib, Harmatz, Nolazco, Pierorazio. Data analysis and interpretation: Alkhatib, Harmatz, Pierorazio. Drafting the manuscript: Alkhatib, Harmatz, Leff, Nolazco, Michel, Slinger, McLauchlan, Cortese, Roberson, Pierorazio. Critical revision of the manuscript for scientific and factual content: Nolazco, Roberson, Lee, Schurhamer, Trinh, Malkowicz. Statistical analysis: Alkhatib, Harmatz. Supervision: Bivalacqua, Guzzo, Pierorazio. Data Availability: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The results of this study were presented as an abstract at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Society of Urologic Oncology, November 28 to December 1, 2023. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading. . .
Harmatz et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: