Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objectives To compare metabolic dysfunction-associated profiles between patients with diabetes who developed different obesity-related site-specific cancers and those who remained free of cancer during follow-up. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Public general outpatient clinics in Hong Kong. Participants Patients with diabetes without a history of malignancy (n=391 921). Primary outcome measures The outcomes of interest were diagnosis of site-specific cancers (colon and rectum, liver, pancreas, bladder, kidney and stomach) during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to assess the associations between metabolic dysfunction and other clinical factors with each site-specific cancer. Results Each 0.1 increase in waist-to-hip ratio was associated with an 11%–35% elevated risk of colorectal, bladder and liver cancers. Each 1% increase in glycated haemoglobin was linked to a 4%–9% higher risk of liver and pancreatic cancers. While low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides were inversely associated with the risk of liver and pancreatic cancers, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was negatively associated with pancreatic, gastric and kidney cancers, but positively associated with liver cancer. Furthermore, liver cirrhosis was linked to a 56% increased risk of pancreatic cancer. No significant association between hypertension and cancer risk was found. Conclusions Metabolic dysfunction-associated profiles contribute to different obesity-related cancer outcomes differentially among patients with diabetes. This study may provide evidence to help identify cancer prevention targets during routine diabetes care.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sarah Tsz Yui Yau
Eman Leung
Martin C. S. Wong
BMJ Open
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Primary Health Care
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yau et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7101bb6db643587688f64 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082414