Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ObjectivesPredicting stroke mortality is crucial for personalized care. This study aims to design and evaluate a machine learning model to predict one-year mortality after a stroke.Materials and methodsData from the National Multiethnic Stroke Registry was utilized. Eight machine learning (ML) models were trained and evaluated using various metrics. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to identify the influential predictors.ResultsAmong 9,840 patients diagnosed with stroke, the XGBoost exhibited optimal performance with high accuracy (94.5%) and AUC (87.3%). Core predictors encompassed National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, age, hospital length of stay, mode of arrival, heart rate, and blood pressure. Increased NIHSS, age, and longer stay correlated with higher mortality. Ambulance arrival and lower diastolic blood pressure and lower body mass index predicted poorer outcomes.ConclusionsThis model's predictive capacity emphasizes the significance of NIHSS, age, hospital stay, arrival mode, heart rate, blood pressure, and BMI in stroke mortality prediction. Specific findings suggest avenues for data quality enhancement, registry expansion, and real-world validation. The study underscores machine learning's potential for early mortality prediction, improving risk assessment, and personalized care. The potential transformation of care delivery through robust ML predictive tools for Stroke outcomes could revolutionize patient care, allowing for personalized plans and improved preventive strategies for stroke patients. However, it is imperative to conduct prospective validation to evaluate its practical clinical effectiveness and ensure its successful adoption across various healthcare environments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ahmad A. Abujaber
Ibrahem Albalkhi
Yahia Imam
Heliyon
Alfaisal University
Hamad Medical Corporation
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Abujaber et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70da3b6db643587687768 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28869
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: