Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction: Throughout history, people with disabilities have consistently been perceived by society through a lens of stigma and prejudice, linked to an ableist ideology that they cannot or are incapable of leading a full life with rights guaranteed to work, education, sexuality, or gender choice. Objective: This paper endeavors to delve into the aspects encompassing the domain of sexuality and the body of people with disabilities as beings endowed with desires, capable of being desired, and holding the right to exercise their sexuality with their inherent particularities. Method: The methodology employed was a qualitative approach, underpinned by investigation and bibliographical analysis, incorporating books, articles, dissertations, legislation, and statistical data. Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework is grounded on scholarly studies concerning the social construction of the body, sexuality, and social policies, as well as legislation pertinent to individuals with disabilities. Results and Discussion: The findings illuminate a paradigm enshrouded in ideals of conformity, martyrdom, and pity concerning the sexuality of these individuals, accentuating the necessity for enhanced implementation of affirmative actions and public policies that acknowledge the specificities of this segment. Research Implications: Investigations into this theme can contribute to demystifying narratives and prejudices associated with the functionality of the body of the person with disabilities, fostering their empowerment and the formulation of policies on gender, sexual and reproductive health, mindful of human diversity. Originality/Value: Thus, the significance of this paper lies in reflecting upon and challenging stigmatized notions, for in the contemporary society where corpornormativity is deemed the aesthetic benchmark, predicated on the ideal of perfect bodies, the perspective on individuals with bodies deviating from this standard is relegated to mere commiseration and denial of rights, a situation that necessitates rectification, aspiring towards dignity, respect, and equality of opportunities for all individuals, across all life's facets.
Pereira et al. (Wed,) studied this question.