Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Neurosciences clinical trials continue to have notoriously high failure rates. Appropriate outcomes selection in early clinical trials is key to maximizing the likelihood of identifying new treatments in psychiatry and neurology. The field lacks good standards for designing outcome strategies, therefore The Outcomes Research Group was formed to develop and promote good practices in outcome selection. This article describes the first published guidance on the standardization of the process for clinical outcomes in neuroscience. A minimal step process is defined starting as early as possible, covering key activities for evidence generation in support of content validity, patient-centricity, validity requirements and considerations for regulatory acceptance. Feedback from expert members is provided, regarding the risks of shortening the process and examples supporting the recommended process are summarized. This methodology is now available to researchers in industry, academia or clinics aiming to implement consensus-based standard practices for clinical outcome selection, contributing to maximizing the efficiency of clinical research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sílvia Zaragoza Domingo
Jordi Alonso
Montse Ferrer
European Neuropsychopharmacology
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Domingo et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7067bb6db643587680100 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.02.009