Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective in evaluating the breast postoperatively since operation and radiotherapy subjected the treated breast to a variety of alterations. This can confound the analysis of ultrasonography and mammographic imaging, particularly for suspected local recurrence. This study aimed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of DCE-MRI in differentiating post-operative changes from recurrent breast cancer (BC) cases after various operative techniques to improve the mapping criteria of breast treatment Patients and Methods: We enrolled 18 cases with history of BC and recieved conservative surgery for treatment in this prospective study. Radiological investigations included Sonomammographic examination and breast Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Diffusion-weighted MRI were collected, and ADC maps were produced. The tumors were categorized using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) method. The findings of histological investigations were regarded as our reference. Results: On measuring ADC values, ADC value was remarkably reduced in recurrent breast cancer (0.92 x10-3 mm2/s) compared to postoperative changes (1.85 x10-3 mm2/s). Moreover, ADC at cutoff level of 1.07 ×10-3 mm2/s was remarkable in detecting recurrent BC with sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 80%. DCE-MRI achieved specificity, sensitivity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 100, 90, 100, 88.9, and 94.4%, respectively for differentiating postoperative benign changes from recurrence breast cancer. Conclusion: DCE-MRI may serve as a beneficial tool in the assessment of postoperative breast since it has excellent sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between benign postoperative alterations and recurrent malignant tumors
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mostafa Mohamad Assy
Ahmed Ragheb
Amany Hafez
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Zagazig University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Assy et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e71db5b6db6435876979f6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2024.273899.3219