Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract OBJECTIVES As life expectancies continue to increase, a greater proportion of older patients will require lung transplants (LTs). However, there are no well-defined age cutoffs for which LT can be performed safely. At our high-volume LT centre, we explored outcomes for LT recipients ≥70 vs 70 years old. METHODS This is a retrospective single-centre study of survival after LT among older recipients. Data were stratified by recipient age (≥70 vs 70 years old) and procedure type (single versus double LT). Demographics and clinical variables were compared using Chi-square test and 2 sample t-test. Survival was assessed by Kaplan–Meier curves and compared by log-rank test with propensity score matching. RESULTS A total of 988 LTs were performed at our centre over 10 years, including 289 LTs in patients ≥70 years old and 699 LTs in patients 70 years old. The recipient groups differed significantly by race (P 0.0001), sex (P = 0.003) and disease aetiology (P 0.0001). Older patients were less likely to receive a double LT compared to younger patients (P 0.0001) and had lower rates of intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (P = 0.019) and shorter length of stay (P = 0.001). Both groups had overall high 1-year survival (85.8% vs 89.1%, respectively). Survival did not differ between groups after propensity matching (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Our data showed high survival for older and younger LT recipients. There were no statistically significant differences observed in survival between the groups after propensity matching, however, a trend in favour of younger patients was observed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mohammed A. Kashem
Temple University Hospital
Hannah Calvelli
University of Pennsylvania
Michael Warnick
Temple University
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Temple University
Kaiser Permanente
Temple University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kashem et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6fa98b6db643587674f37 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae150
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: