Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
As important linear public spaces, urban greenways are highly important for improving public health. Many studies have proven the benefits of urban greenways for human well-being, but fewer studies have focused on the impact of their specific environmental types and characteristics on physical and mental health. In this study, 100 subjects participated in a comparative experiment on three types of urban greenways (urban roads, urban parks, and urban rivers), and corresponding physiological indicator (systolic blood pressure SBP, diastolic blood pressure DBP, and pulse) and psychological indicator (perceived restorativeness scale PRS and positive and negative affect schedule PANAS) data were collected. The results indicated that (1) different greenway environment types lead to different physiological and psychological states; (2) urban park-type greenways (SBP t = 2.37, p = 0.020, DBP t = 2.06, p = 0.042, PANAS = 2.80, PRS = 5.39) have the greatest physical and mental recovery benefits, followed by urban river-type greenways (SBP t = 2.84, p = 0.006, DBP t = 1.29, p = 0.200, PANAS = 2.30, PRS= 5.02) and urban road-type greenways (SBP t = 0.78, p = 0.440, DBP t = 0.37, p = 0.716, PANAS = 2.00, PRS = 4.15); (3) plant color and layer diversity have a significant positive impact on the mental health benefits of the three greenway types; (4) the aesthetics of waterscapes and ornaments can significantly improve the perceived restoration ability of urban river-type greenways; and (5) the comfort of pathways and facilities can effectively promote the psychological recovery potential of urban road-type greenways. These findings systematically demonstrate for the first time the differences in restoration potential among urban greenways of different environmental types and summarize the key landscape characteristic predictors influencing the restoration potential of various types of urban greenways. Our research provides new ideas for proactive greenway interventions for physical and mental health and for enriching the restorative environmental science system.
Cao et al. (Tue,) studied this question.