Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
As a trending mobility choice, e-scooters have become popular in many cities. A number of authorities have initiated shared e-scooter trial schemes to assess the feasibility of the vehicles prior to enacting official legalisation. This paper aims to provide an evidence review of shared e-scooters and investigate how existing evidence may inform long-term policies. This carries significant relevance for jurisdictions that are in a conflicting position with e-scooters, such as New South Wales (NSW), Australia whose context motivates this study. The evidence review focuses on three themes derived from experience with shared e-scooters within the broader micromobility landscape, namely: safety; where shared e-scooters fit into the modal landscape; and the environmental impacts. Findings confirm that ensuring the safety of shared e-scooters requires complex solutions, which may include a clear regulatory framework for e-scooters, safety education and skill training, innovative data collection and analysis methods, and an approach to safety management that is user-based, location-based, and time-based. In terms of modal fit policymakers should encourage first and last-mile combinations with public transport, with consideration of user characteristics; while climate impact is strongly correlated to the mode replaced by e-scooter trips. The paper provides insights for policymakers on the regulation and positioning of shared e-scooters.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yuting Zhang
Transport Research Institute
John D. Nelson
Transport Research Institute
Corinne Mulley
Transport Research Institute
Transport Policy
The University of Sydney
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f722b6db643587672168 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.04.001
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: