Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Surgical Therapy (including ESWL) II (PD10)1 May 2024PD10-06 SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF SINGLE-J VS. DOUBLE-J URETERAL STENTS FOLLOWING URETERORENOSCOPY – A RANDOMIZED TRIAL Catarina Laranjo Tinoco, Luís Martins, Andreia Cardoso, Ana Sofia Araújo, Mariana Capinha, Luís Pinto, Aparício Coutinho, Ricardo Rodrigues, Sara Anacleto, Jorge Ribeiro, Emanuel Carvalho-Dias, Miguel Mendes, Vera Marques, João Pimentel Torres, Carlos Oliveira, Mário Alves, and Paulo Mota Catarina Laranjo TinocoCatarina Laranjo Tinoco , Luís MartinsLuís Martins , Andreia CardosoAndreia Cardoso , Ana Sofia AraújoAna Sofia Araújo , Mariana CapinhaMariana Capinha , Luís PintoLuís Pinto , Aparício CoutinhoAparício Coutinho , Ricardo RodriguesRicardo Rodrigues , Sara AnacletoSara Anacleto , Jorge RibeiroJorge Ribeiro , Emanuel Carvalho-DiasEmanuel Carvalho-Dias , Miguel MendesMiguel Mendes , Vera MarquesVera Marques , João Pimentel TorresJoão Pimentel Torres , Carlos OliveiraCarlos Oliveira , Mário AlvesMário Alves , and Paulo MotaPaulo Mota View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008748.59024.cb.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Ureteral stents are generally used after ureterorenoscopy (URS) procedures, even in uncomplicated ones. We aimed to compare the safety and tolerability of the 2 stent types used in our centre. METHODS: After institutional ethical committee approval, we prospectively randomized patients planned for flexible URS for renal stones between July 2022 and May 2023 to catheterization with single-J stents (removed <24 h after the surgery - Group J) or double-J stents (extracted in a subsequent appointment - Group JJ). Exclusion criteria included ureteral stones, and any urinary tract alteration. Primary outcomes were emergency department admission, postoperative complications and reintervention rate. A symptom questionnaire was applied at postoperative weeks 1 (W1) and 4 (W4). RESULTS: We included 97 patients: 50 in Group J and 47 in Group JJ. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups (Table 1). Double-J stents were removed after a median of 28 days (IQR 21-36). 82% of Group J and 83% of Group JJ patients answered the symptom questionnaires (p=.90).Main outcomes results are described in Table 2. Emergency department admission, total complications, and the need for reintervention due to grade ≥III complications were not statistically different between groups. LUTS were significantly less severe in Group J. Lumbar and supra-pubic pain were not significantly different at W1, but they were less frequent in Group J at W4. 40% of the JJ patients removed the stent before the W4 questionnaire, which might have underestimated the differences between groups. Stone-free was similar in both groups (76% in Group J and 76.6% in Group JJ, p=.37). CONCLUSIONS: Single-J stents removed <24 h after URS were not associated with more post-operative complications, readmission, or reintervention, and they were better tolerated, especially 4 weeks after the surgery. Therefore, they seem a viable alternative for complete flexible URS, reducing costs, hospital visits for stent removal and the associated complications like stent-related symptoms and forgotten stents. Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e187 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Catarina Laranjo Tinoco More articles by this author Luís Martins More articles by this author Andreia Cardoso More articles by this author Ana Sofia Araújo More articles by this author Mariana Capinha More articles by this author Luís Pinto More articles by this author Aparício Coutinho More articles by this author Ricardo Rodrigues More articles by this author Sara Anacleto More articles by this author Jorge Ribeiro More articles by this author Emanuel Carvalho-Dias More articles by this author Miguel Mendes More articles by this author Vera Marques More articles by this author João Pimentel Torres More articles by this author Carlos Oliveira More articles by this author Mário Alves More articles by this author Paulo Mota More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Tinoco et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: