Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Epidemiology NS=26%; p=0.075), hospital re-admission (SW=21%; NS=24%; p=0.36) or mortality (SW=1.3%; NS=1.9%; p=0.51) between groups. There were no significant differences between groups in the 30-day post-URS rates of serum abnormalities (Na p=0.67, K p=0.71, Cl p=0.92, Hgb p=0.30) amongst patients who had normal pre-operative values. CONCLUSIONS: At a high-volume tertiary care center, there were no significant differences in the rates of the complications studied between SW and NS irrigation types. SW irrigation emerges as a safe option for URS, offering the potential for enhanced visualization compared to NS, and, as such, can be considered the standard irrigation solution for URS. Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e749 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Shiv N. Kandappah More articles by this author Luke D. E. Witherspoon More articles by this author Luke F. Reynolds More articles by this author Humberto R. Vigil More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Kandappah et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: