Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) can achieve human-level performance in various tasks, they continue to face challenges when it comes to effectively tackling multi-step physics reasoning tasks. To identify the shortcomings of existing models and facilitate further research in this area, we curated a novel dataset, MM-PhyQA, which comprises well-constructed, high schoollevel multimodal physics problems. By evaluating the performance of contemporary LLMs that are publicly available, both with and without the incorporation of multimodal elements in these problems, we aim to shed light on their capabilities. For generating answers for questions consisting of multimodal input (in this case, images and text) we employed Zero-shot prediction using GPT-4 and utilized LLaVA (LLaVA and LLaVA-1.5), the latter of which were fine-tuned on our dataset. For evaluating the performance of LLMs consisting solely of textual input, we tested the performance of the base and fine-tuned versions of the Mistral-7B and LLaMA2-7b models. We also showcased the performance of the novel Multi-Image Chain-of-Thought (MI-CoT) Prompting technique, which when used to train LLaVA-1.5 13b yielded the best results when tested on our dataset, with superior scores in most metrics and the highest accuracy of 71.65% on the test set.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Avinash Anand
Janak Kapuriya
Apoorv Singh
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anand et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f968b6db643587673c63 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2404.08704
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: