Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper seeks to analyze Bill 21 through the frameworks of minority rights and reasonable accommodation. It problematizes the “problem” of the veil, arguing that legislative deveiling, notably Bill 21, is a symptom of a larger crisis, namely the triumph of majoritarian politics over the constitutional protection of minority rights. Worse, while such laws are the result of popular discomfort with difference, their enactment further entrenches the binaries and assumptions that fuel such populist discomfort. As such, Bill 21 provides a useful case study of the role of law in responding to popular anxieties and in shaping perceptions of difference and equality in the first place.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vrinda Narain (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6e1f0b6db64358765de09 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.21991/cf29470
Vrinda Narain
Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel
McGill University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: