Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BackgroundNanopore sequencing, known for real-time analysis, shows promise for rapid clinical infection diagnosis but lacks effective assays for bloodstream infections (BSIs).MethodsWe prospectively assessed the performance of a novel nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) assay in identifying pathogens and predicting antibiotic resistance in BSIs, analyzing 387 blood samples from December 2021 to April 2023.ResultsThe positivity rate for NTS (69.5%, 269/387) nearly matches that of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) (74.7%, 289/387; p=0.128) and surpasses the positivity rate of conventional blood culture (BC) (33.9%, 131/387; p<0.01). Frequent pathogens detected by NTS included Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=54), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=36), Escherichia coli (n=36), Enterococcus faecium(n=30), Acinetobacter baumannii(n=26), Staphylococcus aureus(n=23), and Human cytomegalovirus (n=37). Against a composite BSI diagnostic standard, NTS demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 84.0% (95% CI 79.5%-87.7%) and 90.1% (95% CI 81.7%-88.5%), respectively. The concordance between NTS and mNGS results (the percentage of total cases where both either detected BSI-related pathogens or were both negative) was 90.2% (359/387), whereas the consistency between NTS and BC was only 60.2% (233/387). In 80.6% (50/62) of the samples with identical pathogens identified by both NTS tests and BCs, the genotypic resistance identified by NTS correlated with culture-confirmed phenotypic resistance. Using NTS, 95% of samples can be tested and analyzed in approximately 7 hours, allowing for early patient diagnosis.ConclusionsNTS is rapid, sensitive, and efficient for detecting BSIs and drug-resistant genes, making it a potential preferred diagnostic tool for early infection identification in critically ill patients.
Han et al. (Wed,) studied this question.