Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Distributed and point-of-care (POC) manufacturing facilities enable an agile pharmaceutical production paradigm that can respond to localized needs, providing personalized and precision medicine. These capabilities are critical for narrow therapeutic index drugs and pediatric or geriatric dosing, among other specialized needs. Advanced additive manufacturing, three-dimensional (3D) printing, and drop-on-demand (DoD) dispensing technologies have begun to expand into pharmaceutical production. We employed a quality by design (QbD) approach to identify critical quality attributes (CQAs), critical material attributes (CMAs), and critical process parameters (CPPs) of a POC pharmaceutical manufacturing paradigm. This theoretical framework encompasses the production of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) "inks" at a centralized facility, which are distributed to POC sites for DoD dispensing into/onto delivery vehicles (e.g., orodispersible films, capsules, single liquid dose vials). Focusing on the POC dispensing/dosing processes, QbD considerations and cause-and-effect analyses identified the dispensed API quantity and solid-state form (CQAs), as well as the nozzle diameter, system pressure channel, and number of drops dispensed (CPPs) for detailed investigation. Final assay quantification and content uniformity CQAs were measured from demonstrative levothyroxine sodium single-dose liquid vials of glycerin/water, meeting the standard acceptance values. Each POC facility is unlikely to maintain full quality control laboratory capabilities, requiring the development of appropriate atline or inline methods to ensure quality control. We developed control strategies, including atline ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) verification of the API ink prior to dispensing, inline drop counting during dispensing, intermediate atline-dispensed volume checks, and offline batch confirmation by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) following production.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas P. Forbes
John G. Gillen
William P. Feeney
Molecular Pharmaceutics
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Material Measurement Laboratory
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Forbes et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6d971b6db6435876556dd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00032
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: