Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract In this paper, I focus on the concept of embeddedness as the background against which eros is a force and a power in and through interactions. To go beyond an internalist account of eros, I engage in a dialogue with some philosophical accounts of desire from an enactive perspective.This enables me to shed light on the location of the embodied tension as “in-between” lovers and “all-around” them. Crucial to this tensional account of embedded eros is the intertwining between self and others’ becomings in processes of participatory sense-making. Through participatory sense-making lovers make their worlds, creating new ways of being and knowing in the ensemble. I advance some steps towards an enactive ethics of eros where, I claim, the cultivation of the space in-between and all-around lovers is the key to avoid the traps of a degenerated form of eros.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Laura Candiotto (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7671fb6db6435876dc15c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09718-5
Laura Candiotto
University of Pardubice
Human Studies
University of Pardubice
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: