Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
abstract: The historian Ibn Khaldūn (d. 1406) is most often treated by historians of philosophy as part of the story of political philosophy in the Islamic world. While this is perfectly legitimate, it may be misleading when it comes to the question of the method he proposes for the historian. This paper argues that that method is in fact based on a different branch of (Aristotelian) science: natural philosophy. After rendering this proposition initially plausible by noting frequent references to "nature" in the Muqaddima , the paper discusses a number of parallels between natural philosophy and history as Ibn Khaldūn conceives it. Ultimately it is suggested that this method is legitimated insofar as history is for Ibn Khaldūn a study of human nature.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Adamson (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e71600b6db64358768e8d1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2024.a925517
Peter Adamson
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Journal of the history of philosophy
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...