Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In the 1980s, Korean history textbooks highlighted significant societal changes driven by pre- and post-establishment reform movements in Joseon, including shifts in the status system. Joseon was depicted as offering greater social mobility compared to Goryeo.BR By the 1990s, textbooks began emphasizing the enduring aspects of the status system, particularly emphasizing a four-class structure, which persisted in subsequent editions. The introduction of the Goryeo legal status system as the 'Yang-cheon(良賤) system' underscored parallels between Goryeo and Joseon.BR Fundamentally, the principles of the status system remained consistent between Goryeo and Joseon. Although the legal rights and obligations of the yangin(良人) became relatively standardized in Joseon, resistance from conflicting interests within the ruling class impeded smooth progress.BR While efforts for equality within the yangin class were underway, opposing forces sought to maintain inequality. The interplay between these dynamics led to both change and continuity in the status system.BR When examining changes in the status system, it's crucial to consider long-term trends and interactions among various agents. Studying movements that counteract specific changes, especially, helps us understand that history doesn't progress linearly toward the present.
Tae Kyoung Lee (Sun,) studied this question.