Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background In Saudi Arabia, approximately one-third of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Late diagnosis is often associated with a worse prognosis. Understanding the risk factors for late-stage presentation of CRC is crucial for developing targeted interventions enabling earlier detection and improved patient outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 17,541 CRC patients from the Saudi Cancer Registry (1997–2017). We defined distant CRCs as late-stage and localized and regional CRCs as early-stage. To assess risk factors for late-stage CRC, we first used multivariable logistic regression, then developed a decision tree to segment regions by late-stage CRC risk, and finally used stratified logistic regression models to examine geographical and sex variations in risk factors. Results Of all cases, 29% had a late-stage diagnosis, and 71% had early-stage CRC. Young (< 50 years) and unmarried women had an increased risk of late-stage CRC, overall and in some regions. Regional risk variations by sex were observed. Sex-related differences in late-stage rectosigmoid cancer risk were observed in specific regions but not in the overall population. Patients diagnosed after 2001 had increased risks of late-stage presentation. Conclusion Our study identified risk factors for late-stage CRC that can guide targeted early detection efforts. Further research is warranted to fully understand these relationships and develop and evaluate effective prevention strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alsadhan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6d598b6db6435876530c8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12270-1
Norah Alsadhan
University of Leeds
Sultana A. Alhurishi
King Saud University
Mar Pujades‐Rodríguez
Preventive Cardiology
BMC Cancer
University of Leeds
King Saud University
Leeds Dental Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...