Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background/Objectives: Clivus metastases from distant neoplasms are uncommon occurrences both in clinical practice and the neurosurgical literature. Surgical management is debated, particularly about the role of surgery and the preferable approach. The aim of this study was to report our surgical experience and review the concerning literature. Methods: Our institutional registry was retrospectively reviewed, and patients who underwent surgical treatment for clival metastasis from 1998 to 2023 were included. A PRISMA systematic review of the literature was performed. Results: Four patients were enrolled, and all of them underwent an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Three presented with cranial nerve (CN) VI palsy. The aim of surgery was biopsy in all cases. No complications were reported. Mean overall survival (OS) was 6 ± 1 months. The systematic review retrieved 27 papers reporting 39 patients who underwent the surgical treatment of clivus metastases. Most of them (79.5%) presented with CN palsies, and EEA was the preferred approach in 92.3% of the cases, to perform a biopsy in most patients (59%). Two hemorrhagic complications (5.1%) were reported, and the mean OS was 9.4 ± 5.6 months. Conclusions: Clival metastases are uncommonly observed, in most cases, during advanced stages of oncological disease. The aim of surgery should be the confirmation of diagnosis and symptomatic relief, balancing the risk–benefit ratio in a multidisciplinary context. EEA is the approach of choice, and it should be carried out in experienced tertiary skull base centers.
Carretta et al. (Sat,) studied this question.