Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The research conducted focused on the capabilities of various non-linear and machine learning (ML) models in estimating the higher heating value (HHV) of biomass using proximate analysis data as inputs. The research was carried out to identify the most appropriate model for the estimation of HHV, which was determined by a statistical analysis of the modeling error. In this sense, artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machine (SVM), random forest regression (RFR), and higher-degree polynomial models were compared. After statistical analysis of the modeling error, the ANN model was found to be the most suitable for estimating the HHV biomass and showed the highest specific regression coefficient, with an R2 of 0.92. SVM (R2 = 0.81), RFR, and polynomial models (R2 = 0.84), on the other hand, also exhibit a high degree of estimation, albeit with somewhat larger modelling errors. The study conducted suggests that ANN models are best suited for the non-linear modeling of HHV of biomass, as they can generalize and search for links between input and output data that are more robust but also more complex in structure.
Brandić et al. (Tue,) studied this question.